Search for: "MASTER v. STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 3,920
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
  It is directed instead to oppositional forces within those states and, more importantly, to the larger group of post-colonial and developing states that are always attentive to changes that might advantage them in their relationship with their former colonial masters or the orthodox hegemony (the terms of the relationship of which always appear ripe for renegotiation). [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:24 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  The final guidance contains a new addition that states that if there is an appropriate justification as to why a sponsor cannot submit patient-level data to FDA through traditional channels, third parties can provide these data through either a pre-IND or Type V Drug Master File (“DMF”) and provide the sponsor with a letter of authorization for FDA to reference the data. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:49 pm by centerforartlaw
Select Additional Sources Shortland, Anja, Lost Art: The Art Loss Register Casebook Vol I (2021) at page 9 ↑ ibid, at page 39 ↑ Cases discussed in this chapter by Shortland: United States of America v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am by Patryk I. Labuda
Both Germany and the United States have advocated the “hybrid” route, with U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 12:38 pm
If he's indeed okay at this point, what's the harm in letting him finish nursing school if he can indeed master the subjects and competently treat patients? [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
—that one could not possibly master the MQD literature or even get a grip on the doctrine. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am by Eric Segall
United States, in which the Could upheld the forced relocation of all people of Japanese descent on the West Coast just because of their ancestry. [read post]
The 2004 Master Manual no longer ranked priorities and implemented changes (2004 Changes) intended to “restor[e] the Missouri River to a more natural state. [read post]