Search for: "MATTER OF L E B" Results 1 - 20 of 2,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 12:41 pm by Matthew Kolken
Matter of E-R-M- & L-R-M-, 25 I&N Dec. 520 (BIA 2011) (1) Section 235(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
And while the filing location and/or the A or B classification was often not in need of extensive analysis, in today’s environment, it is. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 10:10 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Globus argued in support ofthe Rule 50(b) motion that given the overwhelming invalidityevidence presented at trial, judgment as a matter oflaw on invalidity was required even if the court deniedGlobus’s Rule 59(e) motion. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 6:10 am by Ira P. Rothken
The K&L Gates e-discovery site recently published a useful list of current state e-discovery statutes - I found it helpful so I am reproducing the list below - here is a link to the K&L Gates site. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
A few categories of nonimmigrant visas, such as H-1Bs and L-1s, expressly allow “dual intent” in INA 214(b), meaning that a visa holder may pursue permanent residence while simultaneously maintaining his nonimmigrant status. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
L'argument principal de l'opinion est divisé en deux parties : premièrement, le contenu d'une demande bénéficiant de la priorité ne peut pas être opposé au contenu qui n'en bénéficie pas. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am by Blog Editorial
Starting on Monday 20 February 2012 is a one day hearing for In the Matter of S (a Child, in front of a panel of five (L Phillips, L Hale, L Mance, L Kerr, L Wilson). [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 2:40 pm
Mais si la partie adverse omet de se prévaloir d’une requête 50(b) qui contient des éléments étrangers à la requête 50(a), la cour ne relèvera pas le défaut d’office et une décision sera rendue s’agissant de ces éléments. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:57 am by John L. Welch
Therefore, the CAFC was "reluctant to add a silent exception to Section 2(b)" that would allow Houston to escape that section's ban.Finally, the court observed that if Houston wants a rewriting of Section 2(b), it should take the matter up with Congress; the CAFC is not a proper forum for rewriting Congressional acts. [read post]