Search for: "MERCK & CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2009, 10:33 am
Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Mid-America Racing Stables, Inc., 139 F.R.D. 405, 410-11 (W.D. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
See Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm
Merck & Co. 924 F.Supp. 2d 477, 497 (S.D.N.Y. 2013); Pritchett v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(formerly Merck & Co. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
(formerly Merck & Co. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Upjohn Co., 778 A.2d 829, 836-38 (Conn. 2001); Coyle v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
The administration is supporting the manufacturer in that case, Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:04 am
The ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
The conference, co-chaired by its architects Neil J. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
Hyundai Motor America (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Cal App 4th guidance on pre-discovery trade secret disclosures: Perlan Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
Ambu A/S (Filewrapper) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Convenience of false marking plaintiff ‘in the business of litigation’ given little weight in venue dispute: United States of America, ex rel. et. al. v. [read post]
