Search for: "Mai v. Winners Corporation" Results 61 - 80 of 347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the case of Mohamed v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Alice Woolley argued that he was, citing the opening paragraph of his majority opinion in Canada (Attorney General) v Igloo Vikski Inc. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision in Carter v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:32 am by David Super
Pay-go will not only allow major progressive initiatives but may well be crucial to their enactment. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 1:42 am by INFORRM
He has used his blog to take to task “large corporations” who use libel laws to gag free speech, and the Paris club – owned by the Qatar Investment Authority – would no doubt qualify. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:53 am
Farris (04-464). ** Whether the Court would reopen the question of whether a state may constitutionally ban multiple marriages. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:53 am
Farris (04-464). ** Whether the Court would reopen the question of whether a state may constitutionally ban multiple marriages. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/Jfeq4E (Tom Schober) IT and Legal Perspectives on Data Security - bit.ly/JxaydP (Stacy Jackson) IP: Examining the Risks Associated with Corporate Social Media Use – bit.ly/J0rEEK (Marcella Ballard, Deborah Feinblum) Keeping Secrets on Facebook - nyti.ms/JVKEq3 (Somini Sengupta) Lawyers and Social Media: What Could Possibly Go Wrong? [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:19 am by Emma Durand-Wood
The Canadian Corporate Counsel Association named Robert Patzelt, Q.C. the 2012 winner of the Robert V.A. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:15 pm by Schachtman
From the Legal Intelligencer’s account, and the line-up of litigation industry witnesses, the plaintiff’s trial evidence on exposure and standard of care seems shaky, and the winner may not be discernible until the appellate review is concluded. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
… The CourtAppeal Watch: the legality of multi-Crown class proceedings in Sandoz Canada Inc. v British Columbia Last November, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) granted leave to Sanis Health Inc., Shoppers Drug Mart Inc., Sandoz Canada Inc. and McKesson Canada Corporation to appeal Sandoz Canada Inc. v British Columbia, 2023 BCCA 306 (“Sandoz Canada”). [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
Andrew Kent examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:06 am by Terry Hart
” It observed that the Second Circuit has embraced this test, most recently in its decision in Cariou v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:55 am by Edward J. Naughton
  At this level of abstraction, it may seem like the doctrine is simply some free-floating veto that judges can use to pick a winner. [read post]