Search for: "Maling v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Maling v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, SJC-11800: No Conflict of Interest in Concurrent Representation of Competitors by Different Law Firm Offices
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am by Keith L. Miller
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP, the client hired a law firm’s Boston office to secure patents for his screwless eyeglass invention. [read post]
Boston Legal Malpractice Lawyer Blog - http://www.bostonlegalmalpracticelawyer.com/
Maling v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, SJC-11800: No Conflict of Interest in Concurrent Representation of Competitors by Different Law Firm Offices
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am by Keith L. Miller
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP, the client hired a law firm’s Boston office to secure patents for his screwless eyeglass invention. [read post]
Boston Legal Malpractice Lawyer Blog - http://www.bostonlegalmalpracticelawyer.com/
Maling v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, SJC-11800: No Conflict of Interest in Concurrent Representation of Competitors by Different Law Firm Offices
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am by Keith L. Miller
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP, the client hired a law firm’s Boston office to secure patents for his screwless eyeglass invention. [read post]
Boston Legal Malpractice Lawyer Blog - http://www.bostonlegalmalpracticelawyer.com/
No Per Se Ethical Violation for "Subject Matter Conflicts"
12 Jan 2016, 8:44 pm by Patent Docs
Maling v. [read post]
Patent Docs - http://www.patentdocs.org/
Is it Appropriate Prosecute Patents for Direct Competitors on Inventions on Similar Technology without Disclosure and Waivers?
3 Sep 2015, 3:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, SJC-11800. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
Massachusetts Supreme Court rules on patent malpractice case, Maling v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
26 Dec 2015, 7:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The two representations [by Finnegan of Maling and of a competitor in the field of screwless eyeglass hinges ] were not “directly adverse” under the rule because direct adverseness does not arise merely from a conflict of economic interests, but requires “a conflict as to the legal rights and duties of the clients. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Navigating Conflicts Complexities — Material Limitation Conflicts, Positional Conflicts, Business Conflicts
11 Jan 2024, 6:51 am by Dan Bressler
.'” “The Supreme Judicial Court observed in Maling v. [read post]
Bressler Risk Blog - http://www.bresslerriskblog.com