Search for: "Marrero, Appeal of"
Results 41 - 60
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2015, 7:26 am
The Court of Appeals says these allegations may give the opposing players a constitutional claim. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 12:32 pm
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal in Portillo v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:24 am
The Court of Appeals (Katzmann, Winter and Marrero [D.J.]) will have none of this. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
When Davis was on appeal, the Court handed down Arizona v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:09 am
The plaintiff appealed. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:54 pm
Part III: Marrero -- Not An Insurmountable Obstacle To Justice In A Righteous Case. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 8:42 am
[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit [official website] on Thursday upheld the dismissal [opinion, PDF] of a lawsuit brought by South Korea's Woori Bank against Bark of America's Merrill Lynch [corporate websites] unit. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 9:38 am
Approval of the CR settlement was conditioned upon the outcome of the pending Second Circuit appeal in S.E.C. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 11:00 am
On March 15, 2013 the SEC filed an amended complaint against CR Intrinsic Investors, Mathew Martoma and Sidney Gilman and five relief defendants, alleging that CR Intrinsic participated in an insider trading scheme that caused hedge fund portfolios managed by... [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:33 pm
Judge Victor Marrero, a federal district judge in the S.D.N.Y., said he needed more time to consider a $602 million settlement between the SEC and the hedge fund, SAC Capital Advisors LP, intended to resolve insider-trading allegations. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
(relisted after the January 11 and January 18 Conferences) Marrero v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
On August 10, 2011, Judge Victor Marrero of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied Louboutin’s motion for a preliminary injunction against YSL. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:44 am
On August 10, 2011, Judge Victor Marrero of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied Louboutin’s motion for a preliminary injunction against YSL. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
” Appeals Court Rejects Per Se Rule Judge Victor Marrero of the Southern District of New York determined that Christian Louboutin's trademark registration for red soled shoes was not enforceable. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
Judge Marrero’s decision caused a fashion frenzy in the fashion and trade mark spheres, inciting an expected appeal from Louboutin as well as amicus briefs from INTA (amicus brief here) and Tiffany (amicus brief here). [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:30 am
LEXIS 8386, Defendant Ricardo Marrero appealed his judgment of sentence after pleading guilty to two counts of bank robbery. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:50 am
April 25, 2012), Ricardo Marrero, who pleaded guilty to two counts of bank robbery, appealed his sentence, arguing that the District Court erred in classifying him as a career offender under U.S.S.G. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:50 pm
On appeal Louboutin argued that Judge Marrero erred: "By putting a distinctive red color on the previously ignored bottom portion of the shoe, Louboutin established a strong brand identifier. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:21 am
During the hearing, the appeals-court judges wrestled with two main issues: whether Judge Marrero properly interpreted trademark law, and whether to send the case back to him for additional findings, such as whether there would be a “likelihood of confusion” between the two brands. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Judge Marrero confirmed the award. [read post]
