Search for: "Matter of Colon v State of New York" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2017, 10:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Braintree”) appealsfrom the Southern District of New York’s summary judgmentthat Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 12:49 pm
Contrary to NYL's contention, however, "compliance with this minimum standard [does not] automatically relieve a manufacturer or importer of state common law liability" (Colon v BIC USA, Inc., 136 F Supp 2d 196, 208; see Liquore v Tri-Arc Mfg. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 12:11 am
Novello KINGS COUNTYInternational LawChild's Habitual Residence Determined to Be State Of New York Under Article 15 of Hague Convention Matter of Lakhera-Bonnefoy v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:33 am
DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Civil Rights Evidence of Police Falsehood Sufficiently Widespread So as to Be City Policy Approving Illegal Conduct Colon v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:12 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCourt Denies Sentence Clarification; No Intention To Adjust Sentence on Unrelated State Conviction United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:12 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCourt Denies Sentence Clarification; No Intention To Adjust Sentence on Unrelated State Conviction United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 3:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As stated on the editorial page of the New York Times of 14 February 1972 and as held in Matter of Sam F and Bobby S, the law is now weighted heavily against victims and encourages rape by making the punishment so difficult and so rare. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am by Brian Shiffrin
Ferguson, 67 N.Y.2d 383, 390, 494 N.E.2d 77, 81 (1986)    The United States Supreme Court explained division of authority in New York v Hill, 528 U.S. 110 (2000):What suffices for waiver depends on the nature of the right at issue. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, the record does not show that plaintiff was incapable of protecting her legal rights despite her mental health diagnosis (see Burgos v City of New York, 294 AD2d 177, 178 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, where a trial court sets a specific deadline for expert disclosure, it has the discretion, pursuant to CPLR 3126, to impose appropriate sanctions if a party fails to comply with the deadline (see MacDonald v Leif, 89 AD3d 995; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654; Bomzer v Parke-Davis, 41 AD3d 522; Maiorino v City of New York, 39 AD3d 601) . [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
  For instance, in the mid-1960s, Selikoff testified in New York proceedings, in support of a union member, who had died of colon cancer. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:52 am by Bexis
  Because that conduct occurred in plaintiffs’ home states, under New York choice-of-law analysis the law of those states should apply.Celexa/Lexapro, slip op. at 8-9.Choice of law was the battle on the nationwide classes. [read post]