Search for: "Matter of Ny County Des Litig."
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am
Romanoff v Trustees of the Sheryl Romanoff Irrevocable Grantor Trust. 2020 NY Slip Op 31150(U) May 4, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 157641/2014 Judge: James E. d’Auguste illustrates how the thicket grows. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 4:34 am
Movil, S.A.B. de C. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 10:28 am
Konigsberg previously served as an associate at Foran Glennon focusing on first-party property coverage, subrogation recovery, casualty/liability defense matters, as well as other types of commercial litigation. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:14 am
Magidson v Badash ; 2012 NY Slip Op 00935 ; Decided on February 7, 2012 ; Appellate Division, Second Department is a legal malpractice case in which the underlying matter remains undescribed. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:12 pm
Broward County Hous. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:17 am
The 47th Road LLC Case The second fraternal feud decided post-trial by Justice Dufficy, Matter of 47th Road LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 50196(U) [Sup Ct Queens County Feb. 16, 2017], is a dissolution proceeding with what the court called a “tortured history of brother against brother” in which the facts and outcome are the polar opposite of Barone. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:12 am
Dec 02, 2008) (NO. 1, 181)Susanna De La Pava, for appellant. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
In De Vita, the California Supreme Court upheld a local county initiative (Measure J) that amended the Napa County General Plan’s Land Use Element to make redesignations of existing agricultural and open space lands conditional for a 30-year period, with certain exceptions, on voter approval. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
In De Vita, the California Supreme Court upheld a local county initiative (Measure J) that amended the Napa County General Plan’s Land Use Element to make redesignations of existing agricultural and open space lands conditional for a 30-year period, with certain exceptions, on voter approval. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:52 am
In Doeblin v MacArthur (2023 NY Slip Op 30133(U) [Sup Ct, NY County 2023]), Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea J. [read post]
11 May 2016, 11:31 am
The firm has expertise in all real property matters, including full-service litigation and dispute resolution services, transactions, acquisitions, dispositions, leasing, financing, common interest development, construction, management, eminent domain and inverse condemnation, title insurance, environmental law and land use. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 7:16 am
New York, NY. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am
Correspondence exchanged between public officers and agencies and private consultants are within the ambit of the Freedom of Information LawRauh v de Blasio, 2018 NY Slip Op 03115, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe editor of NYPPL has consistently opined that:1. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
Closing the door to disfavored litigants is a common theme they are in agreement on. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Both plaintiff and the City moved for judgment as a matter of law or, alternatively, a new trial. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Both plaintiff and the City moved for judgment as a matter of law or, alternatively, a new trial. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
The case, Matter of Beverwyck Abstract, LLC, 2008 NY Slip Op 06337 (3d Dept July 17, 2008), has its genesis in a business arrangement between the two individual owners of real estate and mortgage brokerage firms (I'll refer to them as the Brokers) and an Attorney who owned a title abstract firm called Gateway Title Agency, LLC. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:06 am
In 1984, Philadelphia County had a non-jury system for asbestos personal injury cases, with a right to “appeal” for a de novo trial with a jury. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 3:43 am
In Feldmeier v Feldmeier Equipment, Inc., 2018 NY Slip Op 05893 [4th Dept Aug. 22, 2018], the Albany-based Appellate Division, Fourth Department, over a one-judge dissent, affirmed a decision and order issued by Justice Donald A. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
The court next concluded that Cash Biz did not waive its right to enforce the arbitration provision because "Cash Biz's filing of a criminal complaint [did] not rise to the extent of active engagement in litigation that Texas courts have consistently held to be specific and deliberate actions inconsistent with a right to arbitrate or that display an intent to resolve a dispute through litigation. [read post]
