Search for: "Matter of Potts"
Results 41 - 60
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
Further, it is well-settled that time spent is, in fact, the least important factor considered by a court in fixing reasonable compensation akin to Matter of Snell, Matter of Potts, and Matter of Kentana. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:23 pm
Potts, 905 F.2d 367 (11th Cir. 1990). [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:04 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 6:51 am
Potts v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:33 pm
List of “Essentials of Canadian Law” e-Books (along with a select few other Irwin Law titles) (list updated July 21, 2014) Link Title Author Year of Publication Link The ABCs of Law School: A Practical Guide to Success without Sacrifice Ali, Ramsay 2002 Link Adding Feminism to Law: The Contributions of Justice Claire L’Heureux-Dubé Sheey, Elizabeth 2004 Link Administrative Law Mullan, David 2001 Link Advocacy and Taxation in Canada Chodikoff, David W. 2004 Link Alternative… [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:04 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:06 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 7:05 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:34 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:35 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
12 May 2014, 6:36 pm
Based upon the criteria established by Matter of Freeman and Matter of Potts as applied to guardian’s ad litem, the court awards the guardian ad litem the fee of $9,000.00. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 7:02 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, without constituting an adverse reflection on the services provided. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:30 am
Potts and find that Ms. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
Potts complained, producing a photograph which was time- and date-stamped as evidence that he owned the copyright in the image. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:13 am
The lease construed in Potts v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:28 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman . [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:29 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
These include: the time spent (Matter of Kelly); the complexity of the questions involved (Matter of Coughlin); the nature of the services provided (Matter of Von Hole); the amount of litigation required (Matter of Sabatino); the amounts involved and the benefit resulting from the execution of such services (Matter of Shalman); the lawyer's experience and reputation (Matter of Brehm); and the customary fee charged by the Bar for similar services… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:57 am
Accordingly, a Brooklyn Probate Lawyer said based upon the affirmation and time records submitted by the guardian ad litem, the foregoing and the criteria to be used in fixing attorneys' fees as established by two cases, Matter of Potts in 1924/1925 and Matter of Freeman in 1974, the court fixed the fee of the attorney in the amount as requested and finds a fee of $1,800.00 to be reasonable. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:34 am
The Take Away The Potts case is not a binding decision for Michigan employers and employees. [read post]
