Search for: "Matter of Stoll" Results 41 - 60 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2010, 9:51 am by Dennis Crouch
I also personally communicate with dozens Patently-O readers each week on matters of patent examination policy. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:25 pm by Walter Olson
As Washington launches a new crusade against “cognitive distraction” behind the wheel, it no longer seems to matter whether your eyes and hands are in correct driving position. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
" She notes the legislative history of the 1952 Patent Act, which confirmed that Congress intended patentable subject matter to include "anything under the sun that is made by man. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 7:15 am by Robert Schaffer & Joseph Robinson
Feb. 6, 2019) (Before Newman, Lourie, and Stoll, Circuit Judges) (Opinion for the Court, Lourie, Circuit Judge) (Dissenting Opinion, Newman, Circuit Judge). [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am by Jason Rantanen
(Boundy.2018.BadGuidance) Colleen Chien and Jiun-Ying Wu, Decoding Patentable Subject Matter, 2018 PatentlyO Patent Law Journal 1. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In a piece titled New patent subject-matter eligibility test hurts US competitiveness, Robert L. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 6:29 am by Gregory Lars Gunnerson
For example, Judge Fernandez Stoll was approved by the United States Senate 95–0. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 8:11 pm by Dennis Crouch
  That panel decision has now been rejected in a 7-4 decision with Judge Stoll penning the majority decision. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 4:43 pm by Dennis Crouch
Dan Ravicher (for Consumer Watchdog) and Kara Stoll (for WARF) both handled themselves very well, but Ravicher noted that the PTO should be at the table since Consumer Watchdog's complaint is with the PTO for wrongfully issuing the patent and then wrongfully confirming patentability in the reexamination. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 8:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Relevant to recusal Circuit Judge Newman and Circuit Judge Stoll are recused, taking no position in this decision. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 2:13 am by Dennis Crouch
The Federal Circuit decision was penned by Judge Lourie and joined by Judge Stoll. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:08 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
The Federal Circuit Decision The Federal Circuit decision was authored by Judge Reyna and joined by Judges Hughes and Stoll. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 8:05 am by Dennis Crouch
(joined by Judge Wallach) Dissenting opinion by Judge Stoll:  Although the decision here is foreclosed by Mayo, the court should rehear the case because it is so important. [read post]