Search for: "Matter of Youmans"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2012, 6:19 pm
The conclusion of IN RE ROGER YOUMAN AND MARNEY MORRIS : The Board did not properly conduct step three of the recapture rule analysis. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:10 am
In re Youman Faults BPAI Recapture Analysis Back in 2010, the BPAI rejected certain claims in Ex parte Youman as attempting to recapture previously surrendered subject matter via a patent reissue application. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:09 am
In the case, In re Roger Youman and Marney Morris, the Federal Circuit reiterated that the proper test for determining whether a Reissue Application improperly claims subject matter forfeited in a prior issued patent is the three-step recapture rule (“Recapture Rule”) laid out in In re Shahram Mostafazadeh,. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 2:13 pm
” In re Youman, 679 F.3d 1335, 1342 (Fed. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 3:10 am
A link to the decision, Ex Parte Roger Youman and Marney Morris is found (here). [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:50 pm
” In re Youman, 679 F.3d at 1343. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 8:31 am
” In re Youman, 679 F.3d 1335, 1342 (Fed. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
According to the decision, an Assistant Attorney General involved in the instant matter provided a copy of the employee’s memorandum to an attorney, apparently the alleged “non-State actor,” involved in a related matter then pending in federal court. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:30 pm
As a matter of policy, we do not comment on these matters. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:00 pm
[The Swamp / Chicago Tribune] * It was only a matter of time before "Client #9" spawned a T-shirt line. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:38 pm
Cir. 1997)); see also In re Youman, 679F.3d 1335, 1347 (Fed. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 12:14 pm
Douglas McNabb and other members of the U.S. law firm practice and write and/or report extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, INTERPOL Red Notice Removal, International Extradition and OFAC SDN Sanctions Removal. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am
Corp., 137 AD3d 1252, 1254, quoting Mirzoeff v Nagar, 52 AD3d 789, 789; see Matter of Chana J.A. v Barry S., 135 AD3d 743, 744; Walter v Jones, Sledzik, Garneau & Nardone, LLP, 67 AD3d 671, 672). [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Clearly, Washington (a witness who was described by witness Youman as having given a false statement) was such a witness at defendant's trial, and nondisclosure cannot be excused merely because the trial prosecutor genuinely disbelieved Youmans' recantation. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 8:41 am
Dreyfuss for Defendant and Appellant.Wagner Kirkman Blaine Klomparens & Youmans and Thomas B. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 3:10 pm
Youmans, 2015 WL 6813669 (June 15, 2015) (following Nosal), with Enhanced Recovery Co. v. [read post]
