Search for: "Mays v. Shields" Results 1 - 20 of 4,521
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
They also explained how prosecutors may use technology to surveil and prosecute women for having abortions. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm by Amy Howe
” Kavanaugh – who served as a deputy to Ken Starr during his investigation of then-President Bill Clinton – cited the Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:21 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
., Inc. v Sturm, ___ AD3d ___, 2024 NY Slip Op 01864 [1st Dept Apr. 4, 2024]), a bombshell decision for already anxious accountants at the height of tax season. 1650 Broadway is a warning to accountants of closely-held businesses that where they allegedly acquire knowledge or information of an owner’s financial improprieties, New York common law may now impose upon them an affirmative duty to make disclosure to a co-owner with whom the accountant has an accountant-client… [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:23 pm
This is a standard, necessary obligation of the defense lawyer in every case where such evidence may exist. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:03 am by Josh Blackman
For those interested in reading further, we discuss the sword-shield dichotomy in Sweeping and Forcing (pp. 389–404); see also Anderson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:41 am by Stephen E. Sachs
Yesterday in my conflict of laws class I taught South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann… [read post]