Search for: "McClain v. Davis"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2024, 8:20 am
Criminal law — Self-defense — Dissatisfaction with counsel On the evening of 4 November 2019, Ricoh Lamar McClaine, Appellant, fought with Kevin Tyrell Davis in the parking lot of a Popeyes restaurant in Oxon Hill following a dispute that arose between the two after Davis cut into a line of people (Appellant among them) awaiting […] The post RICOH LAMAR MCCLAINE v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 12:16 pm
Davis v. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 5:09 am
Davis, 430 F.3d 345 (6th Cir. 2005) (published ten days prior to McClain). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:14 am
Davis v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:48 am
Davis Award). [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 1:22 pm
Davis Bournonville Co., 270 U.S. 390 (1926) Syllabus 1. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
McClain, James Q. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
[12] Davis v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 5:39 pm
See McClain v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm
Novak, University of Michigan Jane Dailey, University of Chicago From Illegal Aliens to Illegal History: A Roundtable Responds to the Return of the Culture Wars in Arizona Chair: Lorena Oropeza, University of California, Davis Lydia Otero, University of Arizona Miroslava Chavez-Garcia, University of California, Davis Milo Alvarez, Bard College at Simon’s Rock Karen Leong, Arizona State University at the Tempe CampusAge Matters: Chronological Age and the… [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Virginia, Skinner v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 6:07 am
Kan. 2002); McClain v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Davis, No. 07-1964 A conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm and possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) although a vehicular safety statute involving dangling ornaments that police relied upon to make the stop at issue was unconstitutionally vague; 2) nevertheless, the exclusionary rule did not apply as police were relying in good faith on a presumptively valid statute. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 2:59 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Murphy v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
The phosphodiesterases 5 inhibitor medications (PDE5i) seem to arouse the litigation propensities of the lawsuit industry. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
In case you want to reach Nick Alden or Dennis Moore, the two lawyers in this case, here’s their contact information: Nick Alden, Attorney at Law 1380 Davies Dr. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
