Search for: "Mccartney v. Doe*"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2010, 10:13 am
Some believe this decision is contrary to the ECJ ruling in Copad SA v Dior (Case C-59/08, 23 April 2009), where a "trademark's prestige" and "the aura of luxury" were found to be "essential" to brand protection. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 10:13 am
Some believe this decision is contrary to the ECJ ruling in Copad SA v Dior (Case C-59/08, 23 April 2009), where a "trademark's prestige" and "the aura of luxury" were found to be "essential" to brand protection. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 12:08 pm
In today’s case (McCartney v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:45 pm
Using the immortal words of Paul McCartney John Lennon (oops!) [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:33 pm
Just ask the employers involved in consolidated cases captioned Rood v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
Molea, 2013 ONSC 5016 http://t.co/kt7HuxD3Yn -> Paul McCartney V. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 9:27 am
Doe v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 10:25 am
As Paul McCartney might sing, “Take a SAD Scheme and make Betty’s better. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 4:08 pm
In this instance, fashion house Stella McCartney Ltd objected to a promotion run by SCA Hygiene Products UK Ltd -- the manufacturers of Bodyform sanitary towels -- in which SCA offered Stella McCartney underwear as a prize. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:43 am
Newsom v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:36 am
Taylor Swift, Paul McCartney Among 180 Artists Signing Petition For Digital Copyright Reform — Rob Levine reports on a letter published this week, signed by 180 recording artists and others, including Taylor Swift, Paul McCartney, and Little Big Town. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/LAJDARGKIM -> Ensuring Enforceability of Online E-Commerce https://t.co/iBN45AHv4Y -> YouTube fires back at Taylor Swift, Paul McCartney and more artists' push for copyright reform https://t.co/xBJIQ43k9I -> U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Extensive analysis of remedies for breach of confidence XY, LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:55 am
Ford and Flowers v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Pretty Polly Limited); and Baker v Quantum Clothing Group… [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 5:11 am
" We side with McCartney on this issue and, indeed, on most issues. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
" Citing Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 11:50 am
Our earlier posts cover both situations and today we’ve stumbled upon another example of the latter -- McCartney v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
–Long v. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 3:47 pm
Apologies to Lennon and McCartney. [read post]
