Search for: "Michael M. v. Superior Court" Results 121 - 140 of 270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2015, 1:22 pm
Stennis to judgeships in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
The defendant on appeal cited to the unpublished Third Circuit opinion Court, Parker v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 1:39 pm by Schachtman
Novartis AG, California Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty., Transcript of Oral Argument on Post-Trial Motions, at 46 -47 (March 18, 2004) (Hon. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
The speakers with me on the session were Giovanni Dosi, Director, Institute of Economics, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna in Pisa and Mariana Mazzucato, Professor, University of Sussex. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
K M Imports Inc. (2014 ONSC 1889) the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded a company which imports Caribbean food into Canada libel damages of Can$50,000. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 11:42 am
Ontario’s Special Investigations Unit scored a huge victory in today’s ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada.In Wood v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 11:25 am by Ron Coleman
BBLP paid the tax and filed an action for a refund in superior court. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Schachtman
Superior Court, 13 Cal.4th 1104, 56 Cal. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]