Search for: "Michigan v. Thomas" Results 361 - 380 of 991
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:47 am by Lyle Denniston
  The issue in a case from a small Michigan community (Fry v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 8:44 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Today, the last day of the term, the SCOTUS announced its 6-2 decision in Voisine v United States which expanded a federal firearm prohibition to include crimes of domestic violence. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:05 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a solo dissent, and Justice Samuel Alito wrote a lengthy dissent, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Thomas. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit that allowed the rule to remain in effect while the EPA revised the way it considered costs in crafting the regulation—a process required by the Supreme Court’s ruling last year in Michigan v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by Christopher Walker
In his concurring opinion in Michigan v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:10 am by Jason Shinn
In 2013 over its decision to fire a transgender funeral director (EEOC v RG & GR Harris Funeral Homes Complaint). [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am by John Elwood
At least Justice Thomas and Justice Alito dissented. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:16 am by Eugene Volokh
DeCiccio (which held that the Second Amendment protects dirks and police batons), as well as between this decision and the Michigan Court of Appeals’ decision in State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:01 pm by Mark Walsh
“Those very brief visits usually involved more laughter than anything else,” Thomas said. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:48 am by Stephen Wermiel
” Although the trend of ruling against Indian interests has generally been a hallmark of more conservative majorities in the Rehnquist and Roberts Courts, the cases sometimes produce odd voting patterns, as with Michigan v. [read post]