Search for: "Miller v. Cooper" Results 181 - 200 of 384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am by Roger Parloff
Bates; Colleen Kollar-Kotelly; Richard Leon (minute entry); and Christopher Cooper. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 4:30 am by INFORRM
Fourth Rule- Don’t cooperate with the Police: US journalists don’t cooperate with the police. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Federal theory in the twentieth century is first developed by institutionalist political scientists, such as Kenneth Wheare, who took the American federation as a lodestar.[8] Thus, the result of Texas v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am by Jan von Hein
Lord Mance stressed that the so-called Miller decisions of the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 5 and R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland (Miller II) [2019] UKSC 41, dealing with the parliamentary procedure of the withdrawal from the EU, are extraordinary regarding the degree of judicial activism from a British point of view. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 8:35 am by Nassiri Law
Miller’s Trucking – Oral Wage Agreement Weighed, March 15, 2015, Costa Mesa Overtime Lawyer Blog [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:43 am
Jim Miller, general manager of Citizens' Mutual Telephone Cooperative, testified as to how the records were secured. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am by Andrei Gribakov
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:20 pm by William Ford
Court of Military Commissions Review, but Miller offered no explanation for the appeal. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Plaintiffs Denied Motion to Depose Defendants Regarding ESI Processes Prior to Discovery Requests: In Miller v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Eschbach v Eschbach and Matter of Melissa K. v Brian K. held that the principal concern in any child custody dispute is the best interests of the child, to be determined by reviewing such factors as maintaining stability for the child, the child's wishes, the home environment with each parent, each parent's past performance, relative fitness, ability to guide and provide for the child's overall well-being, and the willingness of each parent to foster a relationship… [read post]