Search for: "Miner v. Long Is. Light. Co." Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Rev. 1891 was not her first commentary on Edison and the light bulb.For example, one has the 2010 post New light from an old source, which includes the text:Contrary to popular wisdom, however, Edison’s team was merely one of dozens that co-invented electric light bulb.Scientifically speaking, his team’s discoveries were neither the first, nor the most important.What Edison did better than all the other inventors took place not in the laboratory,… [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am by Benjamin Pollard
Roger Parloff discussed the legal landscape for Section 3 of the 14th amendment cases in light of the ruling in Cawthorn v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:14 am by Charles Sartain
Co-authors Paul Yale and Rusty Tucker Herein, highlights from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Briggs, et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 8:27 am
“Confronting diverse readings of the statutory text, we are obliged to defer to the Secretary’s miner-protective construction of the Mine Act so long as it is reasonable. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
  The likelihood of IPF, however, will be relatively low in a cohort of asbestos miners, and thus not a serious source of error. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
: On August 19, 2013, in connection with its entry into a settlement with New York-based hedge fund adviser Phillip Falcone and his advisory firm Harbinger Capital Partners, the SEC for the first time implemented its new policy requiring defendants seeking to settle civil enforcement actions to admit wrongdoing, in contrast to the long-standing practice of allowing defendants to resolve the enforcement actions with a “neither-admit-nor-deny” settlement. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:28 am by The Legal Blog
Mckelvey Co., 42 N.E. 2d 223, 226, 227, 68 Ohio App. 505. [read post]