Search for: "Moore v. Fourth Judicial District Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2019, 8:25 am
In a Massachusetts federal district court case called United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
The warrant therefore complied with the Fourth Amendment and the district court did not err denying the motion. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:59 am
Circuit is ongoing, with the district court considering the motion to dismiss filed by her co-judges. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:20 pm
Moore, 86 F.4th 1038 (Nov. 21, 2023). [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 1:52 pm
Moore-Bush overturned a district court’s decision holding that eight months of warrantless pole camera surveillance violated the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm
Moore-Bush, conflicts with a ruling from Massachusetts’s highest court, which held in 2020 in Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
The latest filing in the Supreme Court’s biggest pending case is a perfect illustration of how not to do serious originalism.The case, Moore v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
The district court denied all of those motions.U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit: U.S. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 1:14 pm
There is a lot to like about United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
And the district courts very well may oblige such requests. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
By way of illustration, I will locate a document from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals case, United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
The Sixth District Court of Appeals reversed the trial court, finding that the stop violated Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:02 pm
It was obvious that such arms are "commonly used by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes," which is the Supreme Court's rule from District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm
Thus cell site data is protected by the Fourth Amendment, even in only small amounts, and the order is denied. (3) Magistrate Judge Orenstein next confronts the closely analogous Supreme Court decision in Smith v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 5:53 pm
,Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Moor v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:01 pm
On appeal from the district court’s denial of the second motion to intervene, the Fourth Circuit panel reversed but the en banc court then upheld the district court’s decision (largely on the same rationale as the district court). [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 12:59 pm
Prods. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 3:54 pm
By Dennis Crouch CLS Bank v. [read post]
