Search for: "National Refining Co. v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2016, 6:25 am
View this document on Scribd The Report states: “Secretary Clinton employed a personal email system to conduct business during her tenure in the United States Senate and her 2008 Presidential campaign. [read post]
10 May 2016, 6:23 am
” The Policy “is paramount to other policies of the University that may conflict, except those grounded expressly in local, state, or national law. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
As found by the Federal Court in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 6:40 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm
Bay Mills Indian Community was significantly more supportive of the historical view of tribal sovereignty urged by the tribe and the United States in this case. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
The United States also has a concept of double patenting to avoid multiple patents on the same invention. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:28 am
United States or Panama Refining. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
The refinement of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 to require sound support for expert witnesses’ opinions has opened the flow of discovery of underlying facts and data considered by expert witnesses before generating their reports. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:04 am
” Nor would enforcing Kroma EU’s interest interfere with the sovereignty of another nation, which generally occurs “where the parties are engaged in parallel litigation within the foreign nation or where the foreign nation takes action against the interest which the plaintiff seeks to assert in the United States court. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:24 am
Holmes Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 4:56 pm
Americas v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:00 pm
In 1935 in Panama Refining Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
That investigation is also far more complex in the United States than a look at the organization of its government might suggest. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:01 pm
But these handguns were more popular in Europe and in the United States. [read post]
28 May 2014, 11:20 am
By Tokesha Collins and Lee Vail On May 15, 2014, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) announced that it intended to publish a proposed rule to amend the national emission standards governing petroleum refineries. [1] The emission standards impacted by this proposed rulemaking are: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (“NESHAP”) from Petroleum Refineries (40 CFR part 63, subpart CC) (Refinery MACT 1); National… [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:36 pm
" Of course, this idea has always been subject to refinement and contestation. [read post]
