Search for: "National Steel Corp. v. Long" Results 1 - 20 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2018, 10:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Metro-North Commuter R.R., 92 F.3d, 117, 126 (2d Cir. 1996) (awarding front pay for over 20 years); Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F.2d at 1189 (2d Cir. 1992) (awarding front pay for a 17-year period).Saber v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:11 pm by Lee Tankle
Many of you may recall what happened the last time the Supreme Court found that the Board lacked a proper quorum, in New Process Steel v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937) The “activity” test will almost always be relevant only to the third type of use of the Commerce Clause. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:57 am by Marissa Miller
Steel Corp., a recently granted case which asks what constitutes “changing clothes” within the meaning of Section 203(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm by Chris Attig
   When the airborne particles, or the poisonous plume in the ground, reaches the shores of a nation, it stops dead in its tracks. [read post]