Search for: "National Transit Co. v. Davis" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 10:28 pm
My California-Davis colleague Andrea K. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
City of Miami and Wells Fargo & Co. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In my last column, Part I of this Two-Part series, I argued that lower courts are justified in paying (indeed perhaps required to pay) close attention to Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion in this summer’s blockbuster Burwell v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
Texas, and the False Claims Act in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The National Law Review has more information. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am by Schachtman
National Gypsum Co., 739 F. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Peter Margulies
Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the Court, drew support from the court’s opinion in 1962’s Glidden Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  Usually, this occurs when governments issue surveillance directives requiring production of data held outside their national borders. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 3:14 pm
Box 65219 South Salt Lake, UT 84165 Phone: (801) 266-1805 Fax: (801) 266-2404 E-mail: contact@ucputah.org Web: http://www.ucputah.org UTAH STATE RESOURCES AGING Division of Aging and Adult Services 120 North 200 West Salt Lake City, UT 84145-05 Phone: (801) 538-3910 Fax: (801) 538-3910 ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Rocky Mountain Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center 3630 Sinton Road, Suite 103 Colorado Springs, CO 80907 Phone: (719) 444-0268… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am by law shucks
And when it’s former-associate v. firm, that’s all the more interesting. [read post]