Search for: "Nettles v. Laws" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm by Stephen Page
It was entitled: Grasping the nettle: obtaining a protection order.Here is the paper:GRASPING THE NETTLE: OBTAINING A PROTECTION ORDER Presentation to Australia’s CEO Challenge 4 May, 20101. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 10:54 am by Kent Scheidegger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting sort of en banc, decided Nettles v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:04 am by Michael Douglas
Nettle J quoted (at [269]) the following passage from the native title case Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria (2002) 214 CLR 422, 445 [49] (Gleeson CJ, Gummow and Hayne JJ): Laws and customs do not exist in a vacuum. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
On 7 September 2023, the High Court of Northern Ireland delivered judgment in the case of McGettigan v Mannok Holdings [2023] NIKB 90. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Kux This post was originally published in the Gazette of Law and Journalism, Australia’s leading online media law publication. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by jeffreynewmanadmin
The whistleblower in this case was represented by Bill Nettles and Fran Trapp of the Law Offices of Bill Nettles, and Bryan Vroon of the Law Offices of Bryan A. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 11:12 am by Philip A. Guzman, Esq.
I’ve learned through my own years in law school, and now as a law school career counselor, that if nothing else, law school graduation is a celebration of all that a law student has been through – good and bad. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Nettle v Cruse [2021] FCA 93 Sydney based plastic surgeon Dr Nettle refused to operate on Ms Cruse. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
As part of our annual review of defamation law in the jurisdiction, we examine two notable reported judgments from 2021 and, as the Northern Ireland Assembly’s legislative programme reaches the final stages, the nature of the reforms proposed by the Defamation Bill. 2021 Cases: MacAirt and Others v JPI Media NI and Foster v Jessen Two reported judgments stood out in 2021. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
The revolution in Australian constitutional law represented by Cole v Whitfield should not, however, prove effective solely within Australia, just as prior Australian decisions were not restricted in their influence to this nation. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Privacy Injunctions, Emory Law Journal, Forthcoming, Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2021-35, Danielle Keats Citron, University of Virginia School of Law Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after a public hearing are outstanding: Abramovich v HarperCollins and Roseneft v HarperCollins, heard 28 and 29 July 2021 (Tipples J). [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Conclusion Over the last four decades English law has developed in conformity with the Brussels Regime. [read post]