Search for: "Nixon v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm
President Obama publicly discussed his disagreement with the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
Some of the relevant publications were Safety Review, starting in 1944, United States Navy Medicine, The Naval Medical Bulletin, and United States Navy Medical News Letter. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
8/5/1974: Shortly after the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:17 pm
For example, AEDPA only permits certain habeas relief if a lower-court decision violates "clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:10 am
’ Since the earliest days of the Republic, ‘every man’ has included the President of the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
”Once it was established that adults in the United States had the right to buy and use contraception, the attention shifted to access. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm
Before joining the Court, Justice Kavanaugh had voiceddoubts about the soundness of the Watergate precedents, specifically, the Court’s unanimous United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
Nixon (1974) (which involved a third-party trial subpoena for a federal criminal case not targeting the president) and Clinton v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
Circuit had outlined these “demanding standards” in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
” Citing Clinton and United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm
”Nixon, 435 U.S. at 598; see also Metlife, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:24 am
Where Kavanaugh and Gorsuch parted company with the majority was in their preference for applying the “demonstrated, specific need” standard of United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:10 am
”1 Since the earliest days of the Republic, “every man” has included the President of the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:51 am
Nixon. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:49 pm
On July 24, the justices ruled 8-0 in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Commenting on the Supreme Court’s controversial rulings on the extent to which the Constitution applied in the territories the United States acquired in the wake of the Spanish-American War, Finley Peter Dunne famously had his character Mr. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:14 pm
She then looks to United States v. [read post]
