Search for: "No. 95-1349"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2013, 11:33 am
We therefore decline to consider Appellant’s unspecified earlier position here, for it was not articulated with particularity in Appellant’s Brief.ANDn re Lovin, 652 F.3d 1349, 1357 (Fed. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 11:01 am
For this reason, the composition of the OD violated A 19(2), first sentence.[4] Violations of A 19(2) were considered to be substantial procedural violations which led to a remittal of the case under A 111(1) and to the reimbursement of the appeal fee in several cases (see decisions T 251/88, T 939/91, T 382/92, T 476/95, T 838/02, T 1349/10).[5] The Board is aware that in two of the cases mentioned above (T 251/88 and T 838/02), the boards asked the appellant or all parties… [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
It is therefore critical that the way in which the objective technical problem is formulated does not unfairly point towards the claimed solution (T 800/95). [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:21 pm
See, e.g., Winner Int’l Royalty Corp. v.Wang, 202 F.3d 1340, 1349–50 (Fed. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 2:44 pm
Ireco, Inc., 190 F.3d 1342, 1349 (Fed. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:37 am
Turning to distinctiveness, the speaker referred to decisions like those in C-265/09 P, C-84/16 P., T-610/21, T-458/21, R 1349/2022-5, and R 362/2023-4. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 9:15 pm
Dyson, 421 U.S. 426, 433-34, 95 S.Ct. 1691, 44 L.Ed.2d 274 (1975) (permitting abstention under Younger v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Intervals obtained this way cover the true value about 95% of the time, and 95% is the confidence level or the confidence coefficient. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 9:25 pm
Id. at 694-95. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
The goal of the scientific standard – the 95 percent confidence interval – is to avoid claiming an effect when there is none (i.e., a false positive).31“ Id. at 66. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:42 am
However, if it costs the taxpayer $1 to determine that they are 95% sure the deduction or credit is between $40 and $80, and $400 to determine that they are 95% sure the deduction or credit is between $59 and $61; it is not worth it for the tax payer to calculate the deduction or credit at all if such a high degree of precision is required. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 4:55 pm
Bush Hog, LLC, 703 F.3d 1349, 1356 (Fed. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm
., 216 F.3d 1343, 1349 (Fed. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm
Ireco, Inc., 190 F.3d 1342, 1349 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 4:42 am
" Durruthy, 351 F.3d at 1094-95 (finding de minimis force where police officer pulled plaintiff to the ground, pinned his arms behind him, kneed him in the back, and handcuffed him); see Vinyard v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:52 am
Code § 18.2–95.U.S. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:12 pm
Richardson, 2008 BCSC 1349 at para. 84. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:43 am
Table 5: Statute under Which Case Was Brought, Amount Paid, and Number of Payments Paid by Treasury from the Judgment Fund on Behalf of Interior, March 2001 through September 2010 Statute under which case was brought a Attorney fees and costs # of payments Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1540 $21,298,971 b 238 Civil Rights Act Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16 1,243,194 38 Tucker Act (inverse condemnation & other claims), 28 U.S.C. 1491 … [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
