Search for: "No. 98-1986"
Results 141 - 160
of 345
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
A criminal defendant may commit the offense of Endangering the Welfare of a Child through a single act or through multiple acts over a period of time (see People v Keindl, 68 NY2d 410, 421 [1986]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
A criminal defendant may commit the offense of Endangering the Welfare of a Child through a single act or through multiple acts over a period of time (see People v Keindl, 68 NY2d 410, 421 [1986]). [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:00 pm
A criminal defendant may commit the offense of Endangering the Welfare of a Child through a single act or through multiple acts over a period of time (see People v Keindl, 68 NY2d 410, 421 [1986]). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 5:18 pm
In a unanimous decision released yesterday, in Carter v.Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5, the Supreme Court of Canada held “that the prohibition on physician-assisted dying is void insofar as it deprives a competent adult of such assistance where (1) the person affected clearly consents to the termination of life; and (2) the person has a grievous and irremediable medical condition (including an illness, disease or disability) that causes enduring suffering that is intolerable to the… [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
In In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, a split CAFC panel observedContrary to Cuozzo’s contention, we hold that we lackjurisdiction to review the PTO’s decision to institute IPR.We affirm the Board’s final determination, finding noerror in the Board’s claim construction under the broadestreasonable interpretation standard, the Board’s obviousnessdetermination, and the Board’s denial of Cuozzo’smotion to amend.The legal matter involved an inter partes review… [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
Fraser, 478 U.S. 675, 680, 685 (1986), and Morse v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:46 am
National Holiday, beginning in 1986. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
Arrested for DUI? [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:42 am
Swanton, 629 P.2d 98, 98 (Ariz. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
IV, §§ 28-91 to 28-116 (1991); Aspen Municipal Code § 13-98 (1977); Boulder Rev.Code §§ 12-1-1 to 12-1-11 (1987). [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
Grayson, 438 U.S. 41, 45-46, 98 S.Ct. 2610, 2613-14, 57 L.Ed.2d 582 (1978). [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:52 am
., 637 F.3d 1344, 1353, 98 USPQ2d 1253, 1259 (Fed. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
In 1986, Harriet divorced him. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
I’m delighted to report that Michael Rosman and Michelle Scott of the Center for Individual Rights, Lisa Steele of AWARE (Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment), and I have filed an amicus brief on behalf of AWARE in Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
McNeil who, in an essay of the same name (published in (1986) 91 The American Historical Review 1-10), noted that “even the most abstract and academic historiographical ideas do trickle down to the level of the commonplace, if they fit both what a people want to hear and what a people need to know well enough to be useful” and, in terms that might be applied to lawyers/judges as much as historians, observed: “Truths are what historians achieve when they bend… [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
., 1986 WL 69060, at *5-6 (N.D. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
., 788 F. 2d 741, 744–745 (11th Cir. 1986). [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:26 am
De wettelijke regelingen van de krediettransactie en de kredietovereenkomst berusten op Europese richtlijnen (de regeling van de krediettransactie op Richtlijn 87/102/EEG van 22 december 1986, zoals gewijzigd door Richtlijn 90/88/EEG van 22 december 1990 en Richtlijn 98/7/EG van 16 februari 1998; en de regeling van de kredietovereenkomst op Richtlijn 2008/48/EG van 23 april 2008). [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am
Every time judges solicit funds for any cause there is always the risk that those that appear before the court may suspect that the judge may be affected by the resulting financial support.[96] A “system of justice based on how much money you gave or raised for the judge before whom you are appearing cannot sustain public trust, and inevitably the public will believe about the judiciary what they believe about politics: money is what determines results”.[97] If individuals cannot be… [read post]
