Search for: "Office of People's Counsel v. PUBLIC SERV."
Results 61 - 80
of 1,274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2016, 4:43 pm
We serve all of Cape Cod and the surrounding area. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:21 pm
And indeed many restrictions focus on particular places — sidewalks outside people’s homes (Frisby v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
In the ensuing decades, the court has upheld restrictions on the president’s ability to remove executive officers in a handful of other cases, including 1958’s Wiener v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
”Accordingly, the Appellate Division ruled that the hearing officer’s determination that Toolasprashad’s failure to appear “was without good cause” lacked the requisite proof, citing People ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 3:42 pm
The settlement, a "selfish deal" between class counsel and the defendant, dis-served the class. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:00 pm
R.C. 149.43 (“Public record” means records kept by any public office) State ex rel. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 12:56 pm
In Phan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 9:48 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:14 am
In 1947 in the case United Public Workers of America v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
He twice served in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, as Deputy Assistant Attorney General in both the Clinton and Obama Administrations. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
Instead, it concerns the powers of people who have been properly appointed to Justice Department offices "under law" pursuant to other statutory provisions. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:00 am
” Payton served as lead counsel for the University of Michigan, arguing the landmark diversity case Gratz v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 6:15 am
Consider for instance, Public Citizen, which describes itself, on its website, as follows: “Public Citizen serves as the people’s voice in the nation’s capital. *** For four decades, we have proudly championed citizen interests before Congress, the executive branch agencies and the courts. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 11:19 am
(Eugene Volokh) People v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 7:56 am
Consumer Protection and Public Health Issues The NC AGO is very active in the public health space, using traditional consumer protection laws to protect people’s health and safety. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Tellingly, last Friday's opinion makes no mention of the Legislature's intent in passing the Whistleblower Act, and the public policy purposes that the waiver of sovereign immunity effected by the Whistleblower Act was meant to serve. [read post]
