Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES"
Results 401 - 420
of 781
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 5:13 pm
United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) and Brady v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:56 am
"Ample art" was the ridiculous phrase used by the pool reporter to describe the room Sarah Jessica Parker had had prepped to receive the President of the United States and 50 of his glamorous friends. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 8:02 am
In Parker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:49 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Parker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:07 am
Parker v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
Back for a sixth time is Parker v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
United StatesDocket: 11-959Issue(s): (1) Whether, when a false statement is made to an individual who has no connection whatsoever to the federal government, the false statement is nonetheless made in a “matter within the jurisdiction” of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 8:04 am
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm
United States, 11-9711, Jackson v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
United StatesDocket: 11-955Issue(s): Whether the McCormick v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:21 am
Citing its own February 2010 opinion in Litwin v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:26 am
The appellant in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:33 am
At Reason, Jacob Sullum discusses the questions about the constitutionality of warrantless electronic surveillance left open by United States v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
Johnson, 11-1053, a state-on-top habeas case out of the Third Circuit; Parker, Warden v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:13 am
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:03 am
She was treated free of charge at United States Army hospitals by virtue of her husband's military status. [read post]
