Search for: "PRECISE SYSTEMS, INC. v. USA" Results 21 - 40 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  It proposes that we infer from an ambiguous statute and the mere appointment of an agent for service of process a corporation’s consent to general jurisdiction, creating precisely the result that the Court so roundly rejected in [Bauman]. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The fifth defendant relied on Jameel v Dow Jones and Co Inc ([2005] QB 946) for this point, since the same test used there for whether there was a real and substantial tort applied to the attempt to set aside permission for service. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
In a major employment case that was argued on the first day of the term, Epic Systems v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm by Schachtman
When the Supreme Court delivered its decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 pm
PLIVA USA, Inc., ___ F.3d ___, 2014 WL 292700 (4th Cir. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
Corrections USA, 2011 WL 1047638, at *3-4 (E.D. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]