Search for: "Painter v. Painter"
Results 201 - 220
of 452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
The answer to this question might depend on how you view the recent South Carolina Supreme Court's ("SCSCT") Holy Cross v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:20 am
Supreme Court's decision in Morrison v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:20 am
Supreme Court's decision in Morrison v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm
He stated:"No one would argue that a painter should be barred from employing a color intended to convey a basic concept because another painter, while using that shade as an expressive feature of a similar work, also staked out a claim to it as a trademark in that context. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 am
Painter and McLaurin v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:00 am
Barnes v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 11:41 am
Council No. 4 v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:27 am
The Minnesota of Journal of International Law is hosting International Law Week, which culminates in a very exciting conference on International Economic Law in a Time of Change co-sponsored by ASIL Midwest, the ASIL International Economic Law Interest Group, the University of Minnesota Law School, and the Minnesota Journal of International Law and co-chaired by my former colleague & intlawgrrl Washington and Lee University Professor Susan Franck and my new colleague Professor Greg Shaffer.The… [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Cotter v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
Simmons v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
The recent case of Hackett v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:53 pm
Painter in 1950? [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:30 am
(Photo illustration by Justin Painter, Arizona Capitol Museum) In April, the Arizona Capitol Museum opened a new exhibit titled “Under the Copper Dome: The Creation and Changes of Arizona’s Capitol. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 3:05 am
What the CJEU did say was that:Individual words are not protected, because they are not (literary) works;A part of a work is entitled to the same protection as the whole, insofar as that part is sufficiently original in the sense that it is its author's own intellectual creation.According to the AG, this finding is "obvious":the author of a literary work cannot appropriate common words or expressions, in the same way that a composer cannot claim an exclusive right over the notes or a… [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm
Painter v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm
Painter v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:02 am
Painter. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:11 am
” “Galderma had asked V&E to withdraw, but it refused, citing a conflicts waiver that was part of the engagement letter Galderma had signed. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:38 am
In the case of Miele v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:19 am
Konishi V. [read post]
