Search for: "Park v. Respondent"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,453
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” The Supreme Court held in International Union, UAW v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm
The school board also provided scripts for teachers to use in responding to student questions, including, "Our body parts do not decide our gender. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
The confrontation began after the neighbors parked their cars near Grisanti’s driveway. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
On Thursday 16 May 2024 there will be an injunction application in the privacy case of Department for Education v Hercules KB-2024-000389 Reserved judgements Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot, heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others, heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini… [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:12 am
The case is Governors Ridge Office Park Association v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:04 am
On 8 March 2024, Judge Russell SC delivered judgment in SafeWork NSW v Miller Logistics Pty Ltd; SafeWork NSW v Mitchell Doble [2024] NSWDC 58 (Doble). [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am
Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am
Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:42 am
Bell v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
In Hess v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:44 am
Johnson v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 10:48 am
From Spicuzza v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:11 am
” O’Brien v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:00 am
In the past day, the encampment, which sits between John V. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2024 The thirteen consistory court judgments circulated in April included: Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs Fonts Also included are: CDM Decisions and Safeguarding; Reports from the Independent Reviewer; Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:04 pm
From Kratovil v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]