Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Davis"
Results 141 - 160
of 386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2008, 1:01 am
Mangini of Stark & Stark in the firm's New Jersey Law Blog Court reduces $25 million verdict against hospital, denies motion for new trial - Charleston lawyer Jeffrey V. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 9:35 am
The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision in Sorrell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
Michael V. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 5:52 am
(Columbia University), on Wednesday, January 6, 2021 Tags: Anti-corruption, Corporate crime, FCPA, Incentives, Management, Misconduct, Non-prosecution agreement, Securities enforcement, Whistleblowers Another Year of Virtual Shareholder Meetings Posted by Brian V. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 7:24 pm
Davis L. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
Perhaps unsurprisingly, a federal court sent his hostile work environment claim under Title VII to trial (Davis v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
HIGGINS, Appellant, v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:16 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:30 am
Pennsylvania v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
Hayes and Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 5:45 am
Supreme Court decisions is Dred Scott v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
In Iancu v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
Fisch (University of Pennsylvania Law School), Annamaria Lusardi (George Washington University), and Andrea Hasler (George Washington University), on Friday, June 14, 2019 Tags: 401(k), Corporate liability, ERISA, Information asymmetries, Investor protection, Liability standards, Retirement plans Exchanging Views on Exchange-Traded Funds Posted by Hester M. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
For example, in Thomas v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 7:20 am
Korlea, 380 A.2d 758 (Pa. 1977) and Davis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:04 am
The less aggressive redistricting plans adopted this cycle show that even strong partisans have absorbed the lesson that if you create a bunch of 53 percent districts you can lose them when your side’s support goes down by 4 or 5 percent.Justice O'Connor said it best in the original political gerrymandering case, Davis v. [read post]
