Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Davis" Results 161 - 180 of 386
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
Regulating rishvat in early colonial India”·         Elizabeth Lhost, University of Chicago, “Philatelic Fraud and the Materiality of Law: Policing stamped paper in British India”·         Mitra Sharafi, University of Wisconsin-Madison, “Corruption and Forensic Experts in late colonial India·         Simanti Dasgupta, University of… [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
Joseph Watson is a prisoner in Pennsylvania, and Ronald Coutts is a corrections officer at his facility. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
An application for permission to appeal has been lodged in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same date there was a hearing in the case of PTW v WPT before Lewis J who gave an ex tempore judgment. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday 2 February 2017, Garnham J heard an application in the privacy case of ZXC v Bloomberg LLP. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Harris, University of California, Davis, School of Law Stephen Lee, University of California, Irvine School of Law Guadalupe T. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 7:37 am by Howard Friedman
Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, 2016 U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Optical Express v Associated Newspapers Ltd, 16 November 2016 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Lin, Professor of Law, University of California, Davis, School of Law—Community Levers for Benefit Sharing James N. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
A nice primer on the Dead Man’s Rule is provided by the court in the case of Davis v. [read post]