Search for: "People v Bush" Results 1 - 20 of 2,167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Or, to raise the question in a constitutional context, he would have been President (well, maybe he would have been President) if Justice O’Connor had joined the four dissenters in Bush v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 The male conservatives also pretended that every potential future issue involving presidential immunity had to be worked out in this case, which is exactly the opposite position of the “good for one day” language and theme of Bush v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm by Mark Walsh
Bush, was here Monday for the big argument in City of Grants Pass v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am by Michael C. Dorf
§ 1512) that was at issue in yesterday's oral argument in Fischer v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
    "GET OVER IT”Justice Scalia used to hammer audiences with this command when asked about Bush v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Congratulations to Bethany Berger upon her receipt of the Perry Zirkel ’76 Distinguished Teaching Award at UConn Law (UConn Today).Christine Lamberson, Director, Federal Judicial History Office, has a post on Chy Lung v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:00 am by INFORRM
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ RightsNoudehouenou v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Bush (2004), the first case involving detentions at Guantanamo, and in Munaf v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
The most glaring example is a Rehnquist Court decision--Bush v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Antonin Scalia had an acid tongue ("pure applesauce," "jiggery-pokery"), and he did his share of trolling as well (once responding to a law student's question about Bush v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”              There is no doubt that Hasen’s proposed amendment would cure, for once and for all, the lacunae announced (and embraced) by the Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]