Search for: "People v Mancini" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Guest Author
Interestingly, it is this last work—counselling “firm rule over people”—which grounds the insurgent common good constitutionalism, the New Right’s substantive legal theory. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 10:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Henry Mancini, Did They Mention the Music? [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 10:30 am
When Officer Jorgensen asked Mancini whether the Church continued to dispense cannabis, she responded that “church members come in, they tithe, choose their sacrament, pray, and then they leave. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 6:55 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Meanwhile, Mancini, a foreman for the service technicians, recorded a video of the Incident on his phone. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz
As the Court searches for the optimal positioning, and calibrates its judicial doctrines in today’s less than perfect Union, we in turn face a challenge of making sense of the paradigmatic jurisprudential shift(s) that ultimately affect the heart and soul of “an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe” and challenge the Member States’ continuing fidelity to it. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:30 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
The appeals court affirmed the $94,232 award on the employee’s Section 1983 claim and affirmed the award of $186,018 in attorneys’ fees and costs (Mancini v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:59 am by Susanne Gössl
Again, this particularly affected religious or indigenous law. d) Citizenship as connecting factor Citizenship serves as a core connecting point, especially for personal matters in Continental European PIL, including Germany (even though it is not based in Savigny’s PIL thinking but is usually attributed to Mancini or the reception of his doctrines). [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 5:58 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court affirmed the $94,232 award on the employee’s Section 1983 claim and affirmed the award of $186,018 in attorneys’ fees and costs (Mancini v. [read post]