Search for: "People v. Cox" Results 181 - 200 of 463
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2017, 5:54 am by David Bernstein
The editors explained how they chose the names on the survey list: “The names were chosen during the editorial meeting attended by Cox, Bradford, Holmes and Virkkala. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
We got too many people on probation [for] felonies already, and . . . [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:16 pm by Mitch Stoltz
As EFF and Public Knowledge told the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the BMG v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
One of the courses I enjoyed most was Archibald Cox’s course on the Supreme Court and the Constitution. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am by Schachtman
The cohort was followed for a median of 6.6 years, in which time there were 154 cases of ovarian cancer, available for analysis using Cox’s proportional hazards model. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]