Search for: "People v. Davis (1979)"
Results 41 - 60
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Lago Vista Independent School District (1998) and Davis v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:42 am
The Fourth Circuit just decided United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
Allen (1979) 442 U.S. 140).People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Smith v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:40 pm
The court relied on the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Smith v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Co. v Zuk, 78 NY2d 41 [1991]; People v Licitra, 47 NY2d 554 [1979]), absent any proof that the defendant had any medical training or knowledge of anatomy or physiology regarding the risks of a leg wound involving the femoral artery, and that such involvement could likely be fatal. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm
The problem was based on United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
I’m delighted to say that Robert Corn-Revere, Ronald London, and Lisa Beth Zycherman (all of Davis Wright Tremaine) and I have filed an amicus brief on behalf of Mary Beth Tinker and John Tinker supporting the petition for certiorari in Dariano v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Moreover, people often have multiple motives for what they say. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
Supreme Court’s 1979 decision of Smith v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
(the link is to the decision that is being appealed), and my students Nathan Davis, Sara Liss, and Paulette Rodriguez-Lopez worked on the brief. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
“Hmm”, mused Merpel, “the lengths which some people will go to in order to secure the referee of their choice never ceases to amaze. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:03 am
U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
”) People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:33 pm
Martinez, 588 F.2d 495 (5thCir. 1979). [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:38 am
See Davis v. [read post]
