Search for: "People v. Hale"
Results 121 - 140
of 374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2008, 12:19 am
People v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 6:31 am
People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 2:25 am
.
People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 3:13 pm
View the article here LA - Kennedy v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
The Royal College of Nursing & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2010] EWHC 2761 (Admin) (10 November 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that a scheme which prohibits people convicted or cautioned for certain crimes from working with children or vulnerable adults breaches human rights law. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:44 am
” “‘This is every law firm’s worst HIPAA nightmare, even more so for one with the well-regarded reputation like Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe,’ Hales said. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge unanimously allowed the appeals by consent. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:27 am
U.S. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
" Among other heinous contributions, Hale is credited with furthering the legal rule that men cannot rape their wives and the practice of burning women at the stake when they are deemed (by men) to be witches.The citations in the draft opinion are staggering enough but, even after the world criticized Alito for including Hale in that draft, Hale still appeared in the final opinion in much the same manner. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 10:19 am
The caption lists 8 BrandTotal lawyers, primarily from Husch Blackwell, and 11 Facebook lawyers from Wilmer Hale (plus at least 4 more from other firms), and they have marshaled some arcane/picayune arguments in an attempt to win at apparently any cost. [read post]
7 May 2013, 1:07 pm
On May 3, 2013, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued an opinion awarding appellate attorney's fees and costs against the City & County of Honolulu in the amount of $41,192.00 in attorney's fees and $343.00 in costs in Kaleikini v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 10:08 am
You may recall in R (M) v Hammersmith LBC [2008] UKHL 14, Baroness Hale, after criticising the authority's failure to carry out an assessment of M for almost all of her judgment, decided that a young person could not be a former relevant child if the authority had not in fact provided the child with accommodation under s.20 even if they should have done. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
See Appellant’s Br., Norman v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:57 am
In addition to the aspects discussed above, there are a few points which people are perhaps not yet focusing on closely enough. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
At the end of the hearing, perturbed by the respondents’ tough predicament, Lady Hale characterised these proceedings as an “anxious case”. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:06 pm
The agency, however, has reclassified FDA-Approved drugs that contain less than 0.1 percent CBD as Schedule V drugs—an apparent carve out for Epidolex. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
There were two shared bathrooms for 13 people and most of the time Mr A was there, only one had hot water. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
There were two shared bathrooms for 13 people and most of the time Mr A was there, only one had hot water. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:52 am
*Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5Miller v The Prime Minister [2019] UKSC 41 [read post]
