Search for: "People v. Lee (1970)" Results 81 - 99 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court in 1976 to reinstate the death penalty in Gregg v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:08 pm by Dave_Fagundes
  The first time I taught copyright, for example, I made a snarky remark about the painting at issue in Lee v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Some people have been distorting my argument by pointing out that some people who were violent leftists in the 1960s and 1970s were friendly with politicians long, long, long after they re-entered the mainstream. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am by velvel
rates charged, the necessity of the services, whether they were performed within a reasonable time commensurate with the problem, the trustee’s skill and experience, and whether the amount of compensation is reasonable in comparison with what is charged by comparably skilled people. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
According to Diogenes Laërtius, this was to convince the people of his time that he had been taken up by the gods on Olympus. * 272 BC: Pyrrhus of Epirus, the famous conquerer and source of the term pyrrhic victory, according to Plutarch died while fighting an urban battle in Argos on the back of an elephant when an old woman threw a roof tile at him, stunning him and allowing an Argive soldier to kill him. * 270 BC: Philitas of Cos, Greek intellectual, is said by… [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 1:36 pm
  I talked to the last Amish guy left in New Glarus (he was recovering from a motorcycle accident), the Rabbi from Lee v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Most consumers agree that intellectual property law is essential to ensure that creators of inventions, ideas, designs, services and the like are rewarded for their creativity and to promote the continuation of such creations.[1] In order to grant creators with the incentive to continue creating, such creators must be equipped with the satisfaction of knowing that their creations will not be transformed into cheap imitations which will inevitably compete with their own original creations. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:14 am
Reports, it’s happened 45 times since 1970, which is around 1% of all cases. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 4:44 am
[See IPBiz post Gettysburg and KSR v. [read post]
26 Feb 2006, 8:17 am by ACS
Thurman of the Magistrate Court in Lee County, Ga., said his state's many fees, known there as add-ons, were a backdoor way to make poor people pay for the free lawyers guaranteed to them by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Gideon v. [read post]