Search for: "People v. Lee (1994)" Results 101 - 120 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by Schachtman
”[ii] Judges, like most people, glibly assumed that what people normally or customarily do is reasonable. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
The pageant does limit itself to people "born … Female with Female Anatomy. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Wood, 18 F.3d 662 (9th Cir. 1994)................................................................36 Cooey v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Since 1994, Stevens has been the senior Associate Justice and so has been responsible for assigning opinions when the Chief Justice is not in the majority. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
Since 1994, Stevens has been the senior Associate Justice and so has been responsible for assigning opinions when the Chief Justice is not in the majority. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
Lodge 837, Int'l Ass'n of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, 26 F.3d 842, 848 (8th Cir.1994). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Most consumers agree that intellectual property law is essential to ensure that creators of inventions, ideas, designs, services and the like are rewarded for their creativity and to promote the continuation of such creations.[1] In order to grant creators with the incentive to continue creating, such creators must be equipped with the satisfaction of knowing that their creations will not be transformed into cheap imitations which will inevitably compete with their own original creations. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm by Dianne Saxe
  Inco was for many years the major employer in the Port Colborne area, employing as many as 2,000 people. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:36 am by Sean Gallagher
In March of 1994, he was arrested by police for trafficking in stolen phone calling card numbers. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:19 am
Johnson, a former state auditor, says that at an airport restaurant in March 1994, Mr. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
According to Diogenes Laërtius, this was to convince the people of his time that he had been taken up by the gods on Olympus. * 272 BC: Pyrrhus of Epirus, the famous conquerer and source of the term pyrrhic victory, according to Plutarch died while fighting an urban battle in Argos on the back of an elephant when an old woman threw a roof tile at him, stunning him and allowing an Argive soldier to kill him. * 270 BC: Philitas of Cos, Greek intellectual, is said by… [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
  To put it in perspective, my group at the University of Toronto was working on multi-touchin 1984 (Lee, Buxton & Smith, 1985), the same year that the first Macintosh computer was released, and we were not the first. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The net effect is a playing field on gun issues that is far more level than it has been since NRA-backed Republicans took over Congress in 1994. [read post]