Search for: "People v. Sharp (1983)" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2007, 5:46 am
§ 1983, should be interpreted to exclude claims under federal statutes and regulations. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Sharpe and Patricia McMahon Misconceptions: Unmarried Motherhood and the Children of Unmarried Parents Act by Lori Chambers The Alberta Supreme Court at 100: History & Authority edited by Jonathan Swainger My Life in Crime and Other Academic Adventures by Martin Friedland 2006 Magistrates, Police & People: Everyday Criminal Justice in Quebec and Lower Canada, 1764-1837 by Donald Fyson The Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba 1870- 1950: A Biographical History by Dale… [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Lombardi, the en banc court held that the district court erred by dismissing the inmate’s Section 1983 method-of-execution claim sua sponte and without holding a hearing. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 9:37 am by Mathews P. George
The Policy, further, states that the focus is on “both people for science and science for people”. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
As I’ve researched this question, I’ve realized more and more that one of the keys to understanding the history is understanding how people in the 18th and 19th centuries conceived “freedom of speech” and “freedom of the press. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am by Kevin LaCroix
 People carrying out transactions in U.K. markets need to have confidence that they are operating on a level-playing field with everyone else. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
Not surprisingly, there are already a slew of reactions to the Court's landmark decision on Friday in Carpenter v. [read post]