Search for: "Phillips v. Shaw"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Phillips, TC Beirne School of Law, University of Queensland, Australia To protect consumers, governments should step in to address the risks of DNA testing. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
See Todd Phillips & Beau J. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 7:03 am
Curtis’ behalf (the Tabak and Phillip cases). [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
On Friday 29 April 2022 there was a hearing in the case of Vardy v Rooney. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 2:17 pm
Martinez, Alex Verdugo, Xander Bogaerts, Hunter Renfroe, Christian Vázquez, Kike Hernandez, Bobby Dalbec, Christian Arroyo). [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 10:34 am
Covid Case of The Week - Wage and Hour Claims Added to Retaliation Claim - Aguayo v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Posted by David Katz and Sabastian V. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 2:49 pm
[emphasis added] The rationale for resisting this special position was enunciated by Justice Parrett in Phillips v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:14 am
Shawe’s allegations that the attorney defendants deceptively backdated a retainer agreement primarily relates to privilege assertions in the Delaware action, and not in New York, and, as such, is not actionable under § 487 (see Doscher v Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, 148 AD3d 523, 524 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
The case is Matrix Basement Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
It's a very interesting read, stemming from a case where the underlying claims have nothing to do with trade secrets.Also outside the non-compete context, but certainly relevant to non-compete claims, is the Appellate Court of Illinois decision in Carlson v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:24 am
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:30 pm
ACA Tax Credits Under Review: Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in King v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:05 pm
” Merrily Archer v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 9:05 am
Looking for more analysis on the Eagle v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
" For the views of other trade secrets blogs on the WEC Carolina decision, see Seyfarth Shaw's post, Fisher & Phillips' post, Epstein Becker's post and Littler's post (my take can be found here). [read post]
