Search for: "Phillips v. United Engineers"
Results 21 - 40
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
Why do Lee and Phillips misrepresent the intentionalist position? [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
Why do Lee and Phillips misrepresent the intentionalist position? [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Its purpose is to "monitor, investigate, and submit to congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
Key Findings The Ohio Commercial Activity Tax, a 0.26 percent tax on business gross receipts above $1 million, is a throwback to an earlier era of taxation, bringing back a tax type that had been in steady retreat for nearly a century. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
United States, 435 U.S. 679, 695 (1978) (“The fact that engineers are often involved in large-scale projects significantly affecting the public safety does not alter our analysis. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
" But even if they were compelled, he adequately waived his Garrityprotections, United States v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 11:06 pm
In County of Galveston v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm
Editor Allison Phillips has said “We have tried everything we could but sadly we just haven’t reached the sales figures we needed to make it work financially. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Apple) Post Grant Admin: GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
Posusney, a structural engineering expert witness. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
Most recently of all, in Nicklinson (Nicklinson and Lamb v the United Kingdom), the ECtH [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
., United States v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
Daubert v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:28 am
PHILLIPS: No. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:45 pm
PHILLIPS: I prefer not to use that word for obvious reasons. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:41 pm
The biggest problem with Alice’s case (presented by Carter Phillips) is its similarity to Bilski v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:38 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
