Search for: "Purcell v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2020, 7:42 am
” At the Daily Wire, Denise Harle comments on FDA v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:22 am
The United States Supreme Court has allowed "flawed" election maps to be used when the chances are too close in time to the election, and a minimal decision from the Court, citing Purcell or redistricting decisions, might simply hold off this decision for 2018.The second, and the one that I've wondered more about, is the Bush v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 4:15 pm
Weekly S387a], State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
Mar. 23, 2010) (complaint “only asserts a state law, without reference to a federal violation, [and] is preempted”); McQuiston v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
Surely it can’t be the rule that the Court cannot fix a Purcell error because doing so violates Purcell; if so, then lower courts could ignore Purcell with impunity.But we want to set aside Purcell, and its emphasis on remedial latitude, to examine a much more fundamental question: was there, to use the language we do above, “a strong and imminent likelihood of a federal violation (constitutional or statutory)” for the district judge in Wisconsin… [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:14 am
“In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 845; see Bells v Foster, 83 AD3d 876, 877). [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:56 am
However, conclusory allegations of damages predicated on speculation cannot suffice for a legal malpractice action (Bua v Purcell & Jngrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 847·848 [2d Dept 2012]). [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 12:52 pm
And, relying on Dixon v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
A decision from a Seattle area trial court sustained a challenge similar to the Utah challenge to an expert witness proffered by plaintiffs’ firm Brayton Purcell. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:49 pm
Professor Rick Hasen has some thoughts on RNC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:40 am
The complaint further alleges that the defendant’s negligence proximately caused the plaintiffs to sustain actual and ascertainable damages in lost rent and in settling the action brought by the Hive, and thus, validly states a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 443; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 847; Wolstencroft v Sassower, 124… [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 10:35 am
The Supreme Court said something similar in Purcell v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 3:33 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Jasper Tran and Cameron Baker write that Allen v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
Arguing for state and local officials in Arizona v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 7:42 pm
” He stated that the Purcell principle required the court to stay the injunction with respect to 2022 elections and if the lower court’s judgment was affirmed after appellate review, the injunction would take effect for congressional elections after 2022. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:23 pm
Brayton-Purcell, S198438 – Review Granted and Held– January 18, 2012. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
United States The New York Law Journal reports that a libel claim filed [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:21 pm
Kurz v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 2:22 pm
The plea by Ohio authorities relies heavily upon thoe Supreme Court’s per curiam ruling two years ago in Purcell v. [read post]
