Search for: "ROCHE v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:25 pm
Schroeder, assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
It is not the case that such an election process to the United States House of Representatives is required by the United States Constitution. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 6:01 am
JASTA cited Halberstam v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
” That royalty is no pittance: In Hughes Aircraft v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 84 (2005) [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Schnitzer, of Hoffman-La Roche. 1955. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 10:31 am
The Federal Circuit’s conclusion is that this “implies that attorney’s fees generally do not involve legal rights. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 10:55 pm
(C-85/76 Hoffman-La Roche v Commission [1979] ECR 461). [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:01 am
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
Ali is another such case:By its own terms, however, the VCPA does not apply to “[a]ny aspect of a consumer transaction which aspect is authorized under laws or regulations of this Commonwealth or the United States, or the formal advisory opinions of any regulatory body or official of this Commonwealth or the United States. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
Raniere v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:55 am
Roche: Which law of assignments governs? [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm
Suncast Corporation (Docket Report) Precision Links – Inadequate pre-filing investigation, unsupportable claims construction and unreliable infringement opinion justify award of attorneys’ fees: Precision Links, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
Id. at 25 (citing Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am
The Guardian reports that the Attorney General has reminded Tweeters that they, too, are subject to privacy injunctions and that he will take action if necessary to “uphold the rule of law”. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
The Court often mentions the “American Rule,” which generally requires that each party pay its own attorney’s fees, lose or win. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:29 am
United States, the Court held that a federal sentencing court must determine whether “an offense under State law” is a “serious drug offense” by consulting the “maximum term of imprisonment” applicable to a defendant’s prior state drug offense at the time of the defendant’s conviction for that offense. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. [read post]
