Search for: "Richard F. Smith" Results 21 - 40 of 458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2015, 1:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Tracy Smith interviewed Brie Larson, who is getting buzz for the movie "Room. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:16 pm
Lenard, supra.The Court of Appeal concluded the introductory part of the opinion by explaining that at Lenard’s trial, awitness from Fifth Third testified at trial that the bank does not have a “cash for deeds” program, and that the bank has never done business with Ryan Smith, Richard Kelly, or Richard Lenard.The jury found Lenard guilty on both counts. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am by SHG
United States, 293 F. 1013 [1923]), held that Ofshe's theories have not gained "general acceptance in the scientific community," and refused to allow him to testify for the defense. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 2:13 am by Tessa Shepperson
Monday The future of the Professions by Richard Susskind and Daniel Susskind I review a book on the future of work. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 4:53 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Stuart-Smith, Emily Boyd, Rachel James, Richard Jones, & Kristian C. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 6:18 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Alan Winters Richard Baldwin & Rikard Forslid, Globotics and Development: When Manufacturing Is Jobless and Services Are Tradeable Adrian Wood, Land Abundance, Openness, and Industrialization Alasdair Smith & Adrian Wood, Theoretical Underpinnings of ‘Land Abundance, Openness, and Industrialization’: How Openness Affects Output Elasticities in a 2 × 2 HOS Model with Product Differentiation Xavier Cirera, Diego Comin, Marcio Cruz, Kyung Min Lee,… [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 10:30 pm by Karen Tani
James, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, has posted Holmes In Nature and Across Time, a review of The Black Book of Justice Holmes (2021), edited by Michael F. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 12:27 pm
Traynor Appellate Moot Court Competition took place at John F. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:31 am by Laura Orr
Smith, 310 Or 1, 13, 791 P2d 836 (1990) ("[I]f the police were directly or indirectly involved to a sufficient extent in initiating, planning, controlling or supporting [the informant's] activities, the exclusionary protection would apply. [read post]