Search for: "Robert J Dow" Results 41 - 60 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
On 26 March 2024, there was a trial in the data protection case of Harrison v Cameron QB-2022-002468 before Steyn J. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 4:16 pm by Schachtman
Robert Brent, a toxicologist, who appears to her as Merrell Dow’s expert witness “always ready to testify that Bendectin does not cause birth defects. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 5:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Barbara Billingsley, Tom Bosley of Happy Days, Pernell Roberts, Stephen J. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 10 April 2024 there were hearings in the cases of Jones Nickolds ltd v Ian Robert Pearce KB-2024-000886 and Specialty Coffee Association Ltd v Elizabeth Odushola KB-2023-002556. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Kiran Bhat
Other coverage comes from Laurie Asseo of Bloomberg, Nina Totenberg of NPR, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Jesse J. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
Some of the first remanded cases went to the District of Oregon, where they landed in front of Judge Robert E. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
For the symposium on Andrew Coan, Rationing the Constitution: How Judicial Capacity Shapes Supreme Court Decision-Making (Harvard University Press 2019).Frederick SchauerAndrew Coan’s important book[i]on the limits of the Supreme Court’s decision-making capacity is built on three foundational points, all of which are correct. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of WFZ v BBC [2024] EWHC 343 (KB). [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
. *** Dow Chemical Co. (7-CA-43257, et al., 7-CB-12626; 349 NLRB No. 11) Midland, MI Jan. 29, 2007. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:39 am by admin
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 911 F.2d 941, 945 & n.6 (3d Cir. 1990) (“Epidemiological studies do not provide direct evidence that a particular plaintiff was injured by exposure to a substance. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am by INFORRM
It is also in accordance with the decision of Sharp J in Ecclestone with which I respectfully agree; ii) It is required by the development of the law recognised in Jameel (Youssef) v Dow Jones as arising from the passing of the Human Rights Act 1998: regard for Art 10 and the principle of proportionality both require it. [89] Applying this analysis to the facts of the case, the judge held that the allegation complained of was not capable of being a personal libel and, if it was,… [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
This defence was used successfully by defendant publishers (on appeal) in Charman v Orion [2008] EMLR 16; and “Searchlight” succeeded (both at trial and on appeal) in Roberts v Gable [2008] QB 502 (a neutral report of a dispute within BNP). [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
In assessing an association for causality, the starting point is “an association between two variables, perfectly clear-cut and beyond what we would care to attribute to the play of chance. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]