Search for: "Roth v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm by Smita Ghosh
In the LA Review of Books, Amy Brady reviews Richard Kluger’s, Indelible Ink: The Trials of John Peter Zenger and the Birth of America’s Free Press, which “tells the complex and thoroughly engaging history leading up to and including the moment of Zenger’s trial for seditious libel of a government figure,” and Stephen Rhode reviews two new books on the death penalty, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment (which provides “a clear and… [read post]
27 May 2022, 12:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
United States (1957), which was modified in some measure by Miller v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d at 326; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88; Peery v United Capital Corp., 84 AD3d 1201). [read post]
3 May 2013, 6:11 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:14 am by Jon Gelman
This is an ongoing battle in the United States and abroad, and the FDA will continue its criminal law enforcement and regulatory efforts,” said John Roth, director of the FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigations. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 10:04 am by Thomas Kaufman
  In so holding, the Ninth Circuit was simply recognizing that the United States Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year in Standard Fire Insurance v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Joshua Matz
Discussing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:01 pm by Josh Blackman
” Milnut, for those of you who have no clue what I am talking about, was, in the words of Justice Stone in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
At Just Security, Marty Lederman disputes the government’s contention in its reply brief that the connection between a foreign national and a United States person or entity “must be ‘substantial,’” calling “[t]hat adjective … a limitation of the SG’s own creation, one not found in the Court’s opinion. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]