Search for: "S. A. v. D. G." Results 1 - 20 of 6,658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2012, 2:46 am by sally
Regina v S (G) [2012] WLR (D) 28 “The transmission of electronically stored data to only one recipient is sufficient publication with section 1(3) of the Obscene Publications Act 1959 for the purposes of a prosecution under that Act.” WLR Daily, 9th February 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 10:45 am
G v HM Treasury; A and others v Same [2008] EWCA Civ 1187; [2008] WLR (D) 339 “The Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 was lawful and validly made under s 1 of the United Nations Act 1946 provided certain words were severed from art 4(2) so that it required the Treasury to show that it had reasonable grounds for suspecting that the person designated was involved in committing or facilitating terrorism and not merely might be such a… [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:24 am
R v G; R v J [2009] UKHL 13; [2009] WLR (D) 80 “To rely on the defence in s 58(3) of the Terrorism Act 2000 a defendant had to show an objectively ‘reasonable excuse’ for his action or possession and a ruling that neither a desire to ‘wind up’ prison officers nor mental illness could [...] [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 7:20 am by Daily Record Staff
(“G&D”) and several of G&Ds subsidiaries, including Deutsch & Gilden, Inc. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:03 am
Regina (G) v Southwark London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 26; [2009] WLR (D) 159 “When a child aged 16 or 17 who had been excluded from his family home applied to the children's service department of the local authority for accommodation under s 20 of the Children Act 1989, and he satisfied all the requirements of [...] [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Dans les décisions G2/12 et G2/13, la Grande Chambre de recours avait jugé que si la CBE interdisait clairement de breveter des procédés essentiellement biologiques d'obtention de végétaux et d'animaux, les végétaux et animaux obtenus par des procédés essentiellement biologiques n'étaient quant à eux pas… [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:24 am by sally
R (G) v Governors of X School (Secretary of State for Children and Schools and Families intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 1; [2010] WLR (D) 4 “Where an individual was subject to two or more sets of proceedings, or phases of a single proceeding, and a civil right or obligation enjoyed or owed by him would be determined in one of them, he could (but not necessarily would), by force of art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, enjoy… [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:20 am by scanner1
FRIEDMAN and HIGH MOUNTAIN SPIRIT QUEST, INC., Plaintiffs and Appellees, v, AARON G. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
According to Solvay, the district court erred when it “decline[d] to read the ‘originality’ requirement of § 102(f) into § 102(g). [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Elaborés à partir de procédés à la pointe de l’innovation (biotechnologies, culture de cellules végétales, chimie fine, synthèse peptidique, extraction végétale…), les produits Sederma sont distribués sur [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:16 am by sally
Regina (G) v Lambeth London Borough Council and another [2011] EWCA Civ 526; [2011] WLR (D) 152“Accommodation ostensibly provided to a child aged 16 to 17 by a council as a local housing authority was to be deemed to be accommodation provided by it as a children’s services authority where the child met the criteria of a ‘child in need’ within section 17(10) of the Children Act 1989 and the actions of a social worker working for the council… [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
L'exclusion des procédés essentiellement biologiques de production de végétaux de l'Art 53 b) CBE peut-elle avoir un impact négatif sur une revendication de produit portant sur des végétaux ou du matériel végétal tel que des parties de végétaux ? [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Earlier this week, Judge Richard G. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:00 am
Les véhicules sont lettrés au nom de Gémitech et ce nom apparaît aussi sur la papeterie, les enseignes et le site web.Génitech, fondée en 2002, s'appelait à l'origine Génie-Tec entrepreneur général inc. mais, sur demande de l'Ordre des ingénieurs en 2007, elle a changé son nom pour Génitech, avec l'approbation de cet organisme. [read post]