Search for: "SAINT-GOBAIN CORPORATION" Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2010, 7:44 am by By Adam Wahlberg
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation, with James H. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 9:05 pm
Gore & Associates against Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation concerning Saint-Gobain's U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:31 am by Richard Renner
  Kasten worked for the Saint Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation from October 2003 to December 11, 2006. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm by admin
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., which held that the Fair Labor Standards Act shielded workers from retaliation for verbal as well as written complaints. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:20 pm
Saint Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation is clearly incorrect because it results in creating a distinction between an in-person and email discussion between an employee and an employer. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:26 am
Also, similar arguments are pending before the Court of First Instance in Case T-56/09 Saint Gobain Glass France and Others v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:17 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.Cases Every Lawyer Should Study.Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 6:31 am by Stanley D. Baum
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation (holding that oral complaints to an employer qualifies as protected activity under the FLSA's anti-retaliation provision). [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:13 am by Molly DiBianca
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation gives employers yet another reason to worry about the FLSA. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:51 am by Richard Renner
Saint Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation, No. 09-834 (March 22, 2011). [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Albena Petrakov, Esq.
The Reuters article highlights four companies that used the Texas Two-Step: Georgia-Pacific, Saint-Gobain, Trane Technologies and Johnson & Johnson. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm by Amanda Rice
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., which concluded that, for purposes of the anti-retaliation provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the phrase “filed any complaint” includes oral complaints. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:47 am by VMaryAbraham
Moderator – Susan Scrupski, Executive Director at The 2.0 Adoption Council, Dachis Group Panelist – Bart Schutte, Director, Web & Architecture, Saint Gobain Panelist – Jamie Pappas, E2.0 & Social Media Strategist, Evangelist, and Community Manager, EMC Corporation Panelist – Lee Bryant, Director, Headshift Panelist – Dennis Howlett, Industry Blogger Panelist – Mary Maida, Information Solutions Manager, Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., a Fair Labor Standards Act case in which the business community had a clear interest, but in which the Chamber did not file a brief and the business community did not prevail.As I hope this post illustrates, the rush to characterize the Court as “pro” or “anti” business based on a handful of cases or even a single term inevitably results in sweeping conclusions that obscure more than they illuminate. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:35 pm by Employment Services
Saint Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the Supreme Court determined that oral complaints were afforded protection from retaliation under the Fair Labor Standards Act.2. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 11:59 am by John C. Monica, Jr.
Preliminary Recipients:  Saint-Gobain, Evonik, Meliorum Tech., Inframat Advanced materials, Antaria, HEFA Rare Earth Canada, Nanocerox, Nyacol, Energenics, MTI Corporation. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:15 am by Max Kennerly
Saint-Gobain, which held that, under the anti-retaliation provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, employers could not fire employees for orally complaining about the employer’s violation of the Act. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 1:09 pm by Andrew Frisch
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation, 563 U.S. 1 (2011), in which the Court held that an oral complaint of an FLSA violation constitutes protected activity, even though the statute (in a companion subsection) refers to a complaint that has been “filed,” which most commonly is interpreted to require a written document. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:02 am by Lyle Denniston
The case was Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics v. [read post]